The chewing gum at least is kosher.
See my essays at:
http://www.radbash.com/my-walls/the-inner-wall/essays/a-solution-for-jerusal
em/
http://www.radbash.com/my-walls/the-inner-wall/essays/solution-west-bank-set
tlements/
http://www.radbash.com/my-walls/the-inner-wall/essays/sovereignty-west-bank/
_____
From: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
[mailto:boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of aletheia kallos
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:17 AM
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops
tripoints
haha an indefensibly thin ribbon of land far removed from its indefensibly
thin homeland already graced by a series of indefensibly thin appendages it
is like the whole thing is made of shoe laces & chewing gum
From: David Phillips <dfp18-WLbs8XpHrcb2fBVCVOL8/***@public.gmane.org>
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:18 PM
Subject: RE: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops
tripoints
The Jordan has to be the eastern border of Palestine, if there is to be a
PS, because otherwise you'd have Israel annexing an indefensible thin ribbon
of land far removed from Israel, an even worse strategic situation than they
have now. Jordan will have to accept jops, just as it has had to accept
jowb, since it renounced its own claim to the WB in 1988.
From: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
[mailto:boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of aletheia kallos
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:12 AM
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops
tripoints
you seem to have presupposed the borders of palestine
jordan seems to be saying it wont have any part of a prospective jops
From: David Phillips <dfp18-WLbs8XpHrcb2fBVCVOL8/***@public.gmane.org>
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops
tripoints
The tripoints would be unaffected by a continued Israeli security presence
in a Sovereign Palestine. It would still be jops -- just with a lot of
Israeli soldiers.
From: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
[mailto:boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of aletheia kallos
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 8:55 AM
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops
tripoints
haha yes & the reportage in it from amman comes as a hard blow to these long
supposed tripoints too
From: David Phillips <dfp18-WLbs8XpHrcb2fBVCVOL8/***@public.gmane.org>
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops
tripoints
Very interesting, but I would hesitate to call hard news anything issued by
John Bolton, the Chairman of the Gatestone Institute.
David F. Phillips
San Francisco
dfp18-WLbs8XpHrcb2fBVCVOL8/***@public.gmane.org
http://www.radbash.com/
From: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
[mailto:boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Aletheia Kallos
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 7:28 AM
To: boundarypointpoint-***@public.gmane.org
Subject: [boundarypointpoint] hard news about the purported iljops tripoints
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3984/jordan-palestinians-border